Clinicians’ perspectives as medical teachers: A qualitative study
Abstract views: 220 / PDF downloads: 108
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.2196Keywords:
Medical education, Teaching, InterviewAbstract
Clinicians both have the responsibility to take care of the patients and to facilitate students to learn. Having different responsibilities at the same time can be stressful for medical teachers and can affect their identity as medical teachers. The aim of the study is to determine and identify approaches to the teaching of medical teachers in a university hospital. The methodology of the research is qualitative research. The educational case study method was used to develop an in-depth understanding of medical teachers’ teaching approaches. We asked the meaning of being a medical teacher, the related factors with teaching, and their best experiences of teaching by individual indepth interview. Nine individual in-depth interviews were held with participants. The most experienced medical teacher has the 27-year of experience and the junior one has 6 months of experience. Three main themes have emerged. The issues at clinical education, teachers’ perspectives on clinical education, and the roles of students and teachers at clinical education. Our study shows the residents, nurses, peer students have roles in clinical education in addition to medical teachers. One of the issues is the limitation to standardize clinical education for each student. All participants mentioned they become an academician for the greater good. The medical teachers are expecting the students to have a high level of situated interest. However, increasing students’ situated interest is up to their prior knowledge of the context, the characteristics of the learning activity, the learning environment, and the approach to the teaching of medical teachers.
Downloads
References
Pype P, Mertens F, Helewaut F, Krystallidou D. Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: understanding team behaviour through team members' perception of interpersonal interaction. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3392-3.
Stenfors-Hayes T, Hult H, Dahlgren LO. What does it mean to be a good teacher and clinical supervisor in medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16(2):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9255-2.
van Lankveld T, Thampy H, Cantillon P, Horsburgh J, Kluijtmans M. Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 132. Med Teach. 2021;43(2):124-36. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838463.
Chen J. Exploring the impact of teacher emotions on their approaches to teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. Br J Educ Psychol. 2019;89(1):57-74. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12220.
Trigwell K. Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science. 2012;40:607-21. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9192-3.
Bearman M, Tai J, Kent F, Edouard V, Nestel D, Molloy E. What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9772-3.
Robins L, Smith S, Kost A, Combs H, Kritek PA, Klein EJ. Faculty Perceptions of Formative Feedback from Medical Students. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(2):168-75. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1657869.
Knight LV, Bligh J. Physicians' perceptions of clinical teaching: a qualitative analysis in the context of change. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(3):221-34. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-4035-0.
Konishi E, Saiki T, Kamiyama H, Nishiya K, Tsunekawa K, Imafuku R, Fujisaki K, Suzuki Y. Improved cognitive apprenticenship clinical teaching after a faculty development program. Pediatr Int. 2020;62(5):542-48. doi: 10.1111/ped.14095. Epub 2020 Apr 7
Keleş Ş, Demirören M, Turan S, Sayek İ. Ethical Responsibilities of the Educators Taking Part in the Education of Health Professionals. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi. 2020;29(4):287-97. doi: 10.17942/sted730054.
Nishiya K, Sekiguchi S, Yoshimura H, Takamura A, Wada H, Konishi E, Saiki T, Tsunekawa K, Fujisaki Y, Suzuki Y. Good clinical teachers in pediatrics: The perspective of pediatricians in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2020;62(5):549-55. doi: 10.1111/ped.14125.
Fredholm A, Manninen K, Hjelmqvist H, Silén C. Authenticity made visible in medical students' experiences of feeling like a doctor, Int J Med Educ. 2019;10:113-21. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5cf7.d60c.
Steinert Y. Faculty development in the health professions: a focus on research and practice: Springer; 2014.
Cleland J, Durning SJ. Researching medical education: John Wiley & Sons; 2022.
Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ. 2000;34(7):551-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00697.x.
Cheek C, Hays R, Smith J, Allen P. Improving case study research in medical education: a systematised review. Med Educ. 2018;52(5):480-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.13469.
Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344.
TEPDAD. The Current List of Acredited Medical Schools. 2023. http://www.tepdad.org.tr/akredite-egitim-programlarinin-guncel-listesi. (Accessed 20.10.2023 2023).
Morgan DL, Morgan DL, Krueger RA. The focus group guidebook: Sage; 1998.
Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846-54. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
Avci E. Should physicians tell the truth without taking social complications into account? A striking case. Med Health Care Philos. 2018;21(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9779-9.
Irmak N. Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform. J Med Ethics. 2016;(42(7):435-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103266. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Liljedahl M. On learning in the clinical environment. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(4):272-5. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0441-x.
O'Brien BC, Battista A. Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(2):483-509. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w.
Samuriwo R, Laws E, Webb K, Bullock A. "I didn't realise they had such a key role." Impact of medical education curriculum change on medical student interactions with nurses: a qualitative exploratory study of student perceptions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(1):75-93. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09906-4.
Narayanan M, White AA, Gallagher TH, Mookherjee S. Twelve tips for teaching quality improvement in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2018;40(10):1060-6. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1388501.
Hauer KE, Ten Cate O, Boscardin C, Irby DM, Iobst W, O'Sullivan PS. Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(3):435-56. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9474-4.
Palanisamy D, Xiong W. An Interactive Approach to Teaching the Clinical Applications of Autonomy and Justice in the Context of Discharge Decision-Making. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10992. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10992.
Shapiro DE, Duquette C, Abbott LM, Babineau T, Pearl A, Haidet P. Beyond Burnout: A Physician Wellness Hierarchy Designed to Prioritize Interventions at the Systems Level. Am J Med. 2019;132(5):556-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.11.028.
Phillips D, Fawns R, Hayes B. From personal reflection to social positioning: the development of a transformational model of professional education in midwifery. Nurs Inq. 2002;9(4):239-49. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00145.x.
Sheu L, Burke C, Masters D, O'Sullivan PS. Understanding Clerkship Student Roles in the Context of 21st-Century Healthcare Systems and Curricular Reform. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(4):367-76. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1433044.
Fuoad SA, El-Sayed W, Marei H. Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student's situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Holistence Publications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When the article is accepted for publication in the HSQ authors transfer all copyright in the article to the Holistence Academy Ar-Ge Yazılım Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık ve Organizasyon Ticaret Ltd. Şti.The authors reserve all proprietary right other than copyright, such as patent rights.
Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.
This paper contains works that have not previously published or not under consideration for publication in other journals.