-The importance of mapping based on geospatial open data sources in disaster management process: Case of 2023 Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquake
Abstract views: 55
/ 
PDF downloads: 62
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.2503Keywords:
Disaster Management Process, Earthquake, Open Data, Geospatial Open DataAbstract
Since there is a race against time in the disaster management process, accessing and mapping accurate and sufficient location-based data sources is of critical importance. In this process, “geospatial open data sources”, which provide rapid access to data and support decision-making processes, make a difference as online, publicly accessible data that can be read, processed, used and mapped by computer programs, and it is seen that maps based on spatial open data sources are frequently used in decision-making before, during and after disasters in the disaster management process. In Turkey, on the other hand, studies on this subject came to the agenda with the February 6 Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquake, which was recorded as one of the biggest disasters in the last century, and brought to the forefront the importance of decision-making based on mapping created from geospatial data by making use of the technology brought by digitalization. In this study, while emphasizing the importance of mapping based on geospatial open data in the disaster management process, it is questioned how the mapping created by using geospatial open data before, during and after the disaster will contribute to the decision-making process in disaster management, it is explained how the maps created from geospatial open data sources used in the response and recovery process of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquake provide an experience for the disaster management process, and suggestions are made for possible future disasters.
Downloads
References
AFAD. (2018). Afet Risk Azaltma Sistemi (ARAS). Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı https://www.afad.gov.tr/afet-risk-azaltma-sistemi-aras Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
AFAD. (2023). 06 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Pazarcık ve Elbistan) Depremleri Saha Çalışmaları Ön Değerlendirme Raporu. Deprem Dairesi Başkanlığı. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Arazi_Onrapor_28022023_surum1_revize.pdf Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
AĞRALİ, Ö. (2022). Twitter Data Analysis: Izmir Earthquake Case. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies.
Aİ, F., COMFORT, L. K., DONG, Y. & ZNATİ, T.(2016). A dynamic decision support system based on geographical information and mobile social networks: A model for tsunami risk mitigation in Padang, Indonesia, Safety Science.
ALAMOURI, A., HASSAN, M. & GERKE, M. (2021). Development of a methodology for real-time retrieving and viewing of spatial data in emergency scenarios. Applied Geomatics.
ALKIŞ, A., ALKIŞ, Z., BATUK, F. G., BAYRAM, B., HELVACI, C., ERASLAN, C., EMEM, O. & DEMİR, N. (2002). Afet Acil Yönetim Bilgi Sistemi (AFAYBİS), Başbakanlık İstanbul Pilot Projesi.
AYAN, B., CAN, M. & GÜRSOY, U. T. (2019). Sosyal Medya Madenciliği ile Firmaların Twitter Verilerinin İncelenmesi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi Uİİİ D-IJEAS, 2019, ISSN 1307-9832.
BALAMİR, M. (2011). Türkiye’nin Deprem Yanlışları, https://www.yeniyaklasimlar.org/?d=1649 Erişim: Temmuz.2024
CHUNG, K. & PARK, R. C. (2016). P2P cloud network services for IoT based disaster situations information. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications.
ÇOBANER, A. A. (2019). Doğal Afetlerde Twitter Kullanımı: Mersin’de 2016 Yılı Sel Felaketi Örneği. MER-AK Akademik Araştırmalar Sosyal Bilimler Kitap-1, 41-67. Mersin: Mer-Ak Mersin Akademi Yayınları.
DEMİRHAN, T. & HACIOĞLU, İ. (2024). 6 Şubat 2023 Türkiye’deki Deprem Fırtınasının X (Twitter) Özelinde Tanımlayıcı Analizlerinin Yapılması. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi.
DOAN, S., HO VO, B. & COLLIER, N. (2011). An analysis of Twitter messages in the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake, International Conference on Electronic Healtcare.
ERGİNLİ, E. (2023). Afet Riskinin Azaltılması için Verinin Kullanımı ve Paylaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, TESEV Yayınları.
ETEMAN, G. S. (2014). NodeXL ile Sosyal Ağ Analizi: #akademikzam Örneği. 15. Uluslararası Ekonometri, Yöneylem Araştırmaları ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı.
FİDAN, G. (2024). Afet Riskinin Azaltılması için Veriye Dayalı Stratejik Planlama-Etkinlik Bilgi Notu
TESEV Değerlendirme Notları 2024/5. https://www.tesev.org.tr/tr/research/afet-riskinin-azaltilmasiicin-veriye-dayali-stratejik-planlama-etkinlik-bilgi-notu/ Erişim: Temmuz.2024
FREW, J., CARVER, L., FISCHER, C., GOODCHILD, M., LARSGAARD, M. L., SMITH, T. & ZHENG, Q. (1995). The Alexandria Rapid Prototype: Building a digital library for spatial information. 1995 ESRI User Conference Proceedings içinde. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
GILL, A. Q., PHENNEL, N., LANE, D. & PHUNG, V. L. (2016). IoT-enabled emergency information supply chain architecture for elderly people: The Australian context. Information Systems.
GRADE. (2023). Global Rapid Post-Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) Report: February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes- Türkiye Report (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
GRIFFITH, D. A., BOEHMKE, B., BRADLEY, R. V., HAZEN, B. T. VE JOHNSON, A. W. (2017). Embedded analytics: improving decision support for humanitarian logistics operations, Annals of Operations Research.
KARATAŞ, İ., IŞIK, A.İ. & YÜKSEL, M.E. (2015). Afet Yönetimi ve Karar Destek Mekanizması Yazılımı, International Burdur Earthquake & Environment Symposium (IBEES2015), 7-9 May, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Burdur-Türkiye.
KİRMAN, F. (2023). Deprem Sonrası Travmatik Stres Tepkileri ve Sosyal Medyada Yansımaları. ANTAKIYAT Journal of Social and Theological Studies.
LANDWEHR, P. M., WEİ, W., KOWALCHUCK, M. & CARLEY, K. M. (2016). Using tweets to support disaster planning, warning and response, Safety Science.
LARSON, R.R. (1996). Geographic Information Retrieval and Spatial Browsing. L. C. Smith, M. Gluck (Ed), Geographic Information systems and Libraries: Patrons, Maps, and Spatial Information, Urbana-Champaign: GSLIS, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
LELE, Q. VE LIHUA, K. (2016). Technical Framework Design of Safety Production Information Management Platform for Chemical Industrial Parks Based on Cloud Computing and the Internet of Things, International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing.
LENKA, R. K. (2016). Comparative analysis of SpatialHadoop and GeoSpark for geospatial big data analytics. 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I). Greater Noida, India: IEEE.
LETTIERI, E., MASELLA, C. & RADAELLI, G. (2009). Disaster management: findings from a systematic review, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal.
LINARDI, S. (2016). Peer coordination and communication following disaster warnings: An experimental framework, Safety Science, 90 (Supplement C).
LOUKİLİ, Y. (2020). Analysis and exploitation of Geospatial Big Data: State of art. 2020 IEEE 14th InternaConference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT).
LV, Z., LI, X. & CHOO, K.-K. R. (2017), E-government multimedia big data platform for disaster management, Multimedia Tools and Applications.
MA, Y. & ZHANG, H. (2017), Enhancing Knowledge Management and Decision-Making Capability of China’s Emergency Operations Center Using Big Data, Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing.
MCCOY, M. D. (2017). Geospatial Big Data and archaeology: Prospects and problems too great to ignore. Journal of Archaeological Science.
MENDOZA, M., POBLETE, B. & VALDERRAMA, I. (2019). Nowcasting earthquake damages with Twitter. EPJ Data Sci.
NEBERT, D.D. (2004). The SDI cookbook: developing spatial data infrastructures v.2.0. Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Association, Technical Working Group.
NEPPALLI, V. K., CARAGEA, C., SQUICCIARINI, A., TAPIA, A. & STEHLE, S. (2017). Sentiment analysis during Hurricane Sandy in emergency response, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 21(Supplement C).
NURLU, M. (2009). Türkiye Afet Bilgi ve İletişim Sistemi (TABIS), Bakanlıklar Arası Harita İşlerini Koordinasyon ve Planlama Kurulu (BHİKPK) I. Sempozyumu.
ONORATI, T. & DÍAZ, P. (2016). Giving meaning to tweets in emergency situations: a semantic approach for filtering and visualizing social data, SpringerPlus.
ÖZÇELİK, A. E., ÇORBACI, Ö. L., YÜKSEK, T. & KURDOĞLU, O. (2023). Korunan Alanların Deprem Sonrası Risk Yönetimi Sürecinde Kullanılabilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi: Kahramanmaraş Merkezli Deprem Bölgesi Örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi.
PAPADOPOULOS, T., GUNASEKARAN, A., DUBEY, R., ALTAY, N., CHİLDE, S. J. & FOSSO-WAMBA, S. (2017). The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production.
PEÑA-MORA, F., AZİZ, Z. U. H., CHEN, A., PLANS, A. & FOLTZ, S. (2008). Building assessment during disaster response and recovery, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers.
PreventionWeb. (2015). Disaster risk reduction & disaster risk management. UNDRR Global Assessment Report 2015.
Qİ, H. & ALTİNAKAR M.S. (2011). A GIS-based decision support system for integrated flood management under uncertainty with two dimensional numerical simulations, Environmental Modelling & Software.
RAY, N. K. & TURUK, A. K. (2017). A framework for post-disaster communication using wireless ad hoc networks, Integration, the VLSI Journal, 58(Supplement C).
UBALDİ, B. (2013). Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 22, OECD Publishing.
UCLG MEWA. (2018). Sendai Afet Risk Azaltma Çerçevesi (2015-2030).
UNDRR. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 – 2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
UNDRR. (2016). Poverty & death: Disaster mortality 1996-2015. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
ÜNAL, C. & SEZER, C. (2023). Tweetler: Türkiye’deki Deprem Felaketine Yönelik Bir İçerik Analizi. 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremlerinin Ardından Sağlık Bakanlığına Yöneltilen, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.
ÜNVER, Ö. (2023). Olası Bir İstanbul Depremine Hazırlanırken: Açık Veri Kaynaklarına Dayalı Haritalamanın Önemi, İPA İstanbul Dergisi, 2023/009.
WANG, W., HU, C., CHEN, N., XIAO, C., WANG, C. & CHEN, Z. (2015). Spatio-temporal enabled urban decision-making process modeling and visualization under the cyber-physical environment, Science China Information Sciences.
YANG, L., YANG, S. H. & PLOTNICK, L. (2013). How the internet of things technology enhances emergency response operations, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
YAO, Y., LIU, X., LI, X., ZHANG, J., LIANG, Z., MAI, K. & ZHANG, Y. (2017). Mapping fine-scale population distributions at the building level by integrating multisource geospatial big data, International Journal of Geographical Information Science.
YEUM, C. M., DYKE, S. J. & RAMIREZ, J. (2018). Visual data classification in post-event building reconnaissance, Engineering Structures.
YİĞİTER, N, D. (2008). Planlamada Afet Bilgi Sistemi ve Yönetiminin Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ile Modellenmesi: Adana Örneği, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
YIN, J., DONG, J., HAMM, N., LI, Z. & WANG, J. (2021). Integrating remote sensing and geospatial big data for urban land use mapping: A review. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation.
ZHENG, Z., SHI, H. Z., ZHOU, Y. C., LU, X. Z. & LIN, J. R. (2022). Earthquake Impact Analysis Based on Text Mining and Social Media Analytics.
ZHOU, S. & ZHAI, G. (2023). A Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Framework for Urban Disaster Prevention Planning: A Case Study of Xiamen, China. In Land.
URL-1: Open Data Handbook, “What is Open Data?”, https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/ Erişim: Haziran 2024
URL-2: http://index.okfn.org/place.html Erişim: Haziran. 2024
URL-3:https://tatd.org.tr/afet/afet-yazi-dizisi/2020de-turkiye-ve-dunyada-en-sik-gorulen-dogal-afetler/ Erişim: Haziran 2024
URL-4: Nisan 2024 yılında yayınlanan 2023 yılı afetleriraporu https://www.emdat.be/publications/ Erişim: Haziran 2024
URL-5:https://bilimgenc.tubitak.gov.tr/turkiyede-son-yuzyilda-gerceklesen-buyuk-depremler Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-6: Birleşmiş Milletler, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030” https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030 Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 2024
URL-7: https://sendaimonitor.undrr.org/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-8: https://www.desinventar.net/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-9: https://blog.esri.com.tr/acil-durum-risk-ve-afet-yonetiminde-esri-cozumleri/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-10: On İkinci Kalkınma Planı, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/%20uploads/2023/12/On-Ikinci-Kalkinma-%20Plani_2024-2028_11122023.pdf Erişim tarihi: Nisan 2024
URL-11: http://afetharita.com Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-12: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/asrin-felaketi/kizilaydan-deprem-bolgesinde-en-yakin-hizmet-noktasi-nerede-uygulamasi/2825305 Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-13:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:2023_Turkey_Earthquakes Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-14: https://openaerialmap.org/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-15: http://www.geopilot.xyz/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-16: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7043548351782338560/?updateEntityUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afs_feedUpdate%3A%28V2%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7043548351782338560%29 Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-17:https://www.directrelief.org/2023/02/mobility-data-shows-movement-away-from-some-urban-areas-after-deadly-earthquake/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-18: itub.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/1bbee5d44fc14f2a86d5e43657127a83 Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 2024
URL-19:http://documents.worldbank.org/b62f08009b2302bd4074030fb Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-20: Kahramanmaraş İl Afet Risk AzaltmaPlanı-2020. İl Afet ve Acil Durum Müdürlüğü, Kahramanmaraş. https://kahramanmaras.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/kahramanmaras.afad/e-kutuphane/IL-PLANLARI/KAHRAMANMARAS%CC%A7-IL-AFET-RISK-AZALTMA-PLANI2022.pdf Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-21: İRAP Kılavuz. (2021). İl afet risk azaltmaplanı hazırlama kılavuzu. Afet ve Acil Durum YönetimiBaşkanlığı (AFAD), Ankara. https://irap.afad. Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-22: https://yercizenler.org/en/home/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-23: https://thinkhazard.org/en/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-24: TAMP 2014 Raporu: https://www.afad.gov.tr/turkiye-afet-mudahale-plani Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-25: Türkiye Ulusal Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi(TUCBS) Coğrafi Veri Talep Platformu: https://tucbsveritalep.csb.gov.tr/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-26: Afet Yönetim ve Karar Destek Sistemi (AYDES): www.kitlekaynak.afad.gov.tr Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-27: Türkiye Ulusal Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Ulusal Coğrafi Bilgi Platformu: https://www.atlas.gov.tr/ Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-28: Türkiye Deprem Temalı Açık veri kaynakları Haritası: https://kumu.io/HasanBasri/acik-veri-ve-afet-calisma-grubu Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-29: https://www.afad.gov.tr/aciklamali-afet-yonetimi-terimleri-sozlugu Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
URL-30: https://mpgm.csb.gov.tr/mekansal-planlar-yapim-yonetmeliginde-degisiklik-yapilmasina-dair-yonetmelik-07.06.2024-tarih-ve-32569-sayili-resmi-gazetede-yayimlandi-duyuru-450921 Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Holistence Publications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When the article is accepted for publication in the Journal of Awareness, authors transfer all copyright in the article to the Rating Academy Ar-Ge Yazılım Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık ve Organizasyon Ticaret Ltd. Şti.The authors reserve all proprietary right other than copyright, such as patent rights.
Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.
This paper contains works that have not previously published or not under consideration for publication in other journals.
