OPERATION COVİD-19: NEGATIVE AFFECTIVE LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC MANIPULATIONS IN THE HEADLINES OF THE NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT TURKEY BY THE NEWS PLATFORMS BROADCASTING IN TURKISH


Abstract views: 121 / PDF downloads: 213

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.6.1.08

Keywords:

Turkey, Covid 19, Negative Affective Language, Linguistics, Discourse, Manipulation

Abstract

As an evolved tool of operation, human language includes new elements, techniques,and practices, such as (pre)judgments, emotions, subjectivity, positive-negative values, valences, and attitudes of speakers and authors. With these features, language creates an illusion between information, reality, news-reporting,and virtual reality, perception,and manipulation. Therefore, language cannot be regarded only as a communication tool that we can define as objective or neutral, but a communication and operation tool loaded with political, cultural,and ideological values. One field in which language is most effectively used as a menas of operation is media. This study analyzes the language and discourse used in the headlines of the news produced by the Voice of America Turkish, the Independent Turkish and Deutsche Welle Turkish media organizations during the Covid 19 pandemic. The study concluded that the headlines obtained as data used a negative affective language, which is the most prominent feature of political and ideological discourse. By using the permutation technique, which is a syntactic manipulation type, the word Turkey was used as the first word of most of the negative sentences. Rhetorical questions containing innuendos were widely used, creating negative perceptions to persuade the target audience to think, believe and act in the selected and desired way. The study argues that the headlines in question were the more biased openings of the biased media contents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BEARD, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. London: Routledge

BALL, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell

BALL, David M. (1997), Innuendo. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(1), January, 35-59

CLORE, G.L. & STORBECK, J. (2006). Affect as information about liking, efficacy, and importance. In J. Forgas (Ed). Hearts and Minds: Affective influences on social cognition and behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.

DOR, D. (2003). On Newspaper Headlines as Relevance Optimizers, Journal of Pragmatics, 35. 695-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0

FORGAS, J. P. (1995). Mood and Judgement: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.

FOUCAULT, M. (2005). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of The Human Sciences. London: Routledge.

FOWLER, R. (1991). Language In The News, London: Routledge.

HUNSTON, S. & THOMPSON, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LICHTER, R. S. (2017). Theories of Media Bias, The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.44_update_001

https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-44).

NG, S. H. & BRADAC, J. J. (1993). Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence, Newbury Park: Sage Publication

NOWAK, K. & HEMANUS, P. (1975). A Comment on: “Propaganda and Indoctrination: a Tentative Concept Analysis” by Pertti Hemanus. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 21(1), 40–43.

ROBERT, H G. & JOHN S S. (2015). Persuasion: Social influence and Compliance Gaining. NY: Routledge

SAUSSURE, L. D. & SCHULZ, P. (2005). Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17

SAUSSUR, L. D. (2005). Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics. Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century Discourse Approaches to Politics. Society and Culture, https:// doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.07sau

SCHWARZ, N.G. & CLORE, G. L. (2003). Mood as Information: 20 Years Later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3&4), 296–303.

VAN DIJK, T.A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

VAN DIJK, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359– 383.

Published

2021-02-24

How to Cite

TURGUT, F. (2021). OPERATION COVİD-19: NEGATIVE AFFECTIVE LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC MANIPULATIONS IN THE HEADLINES OF THE NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT TURKEY BY THE NEWS PLATFORMS BROADCASTING IN TURKISH. JOURNAL OF AWARENESS, 6(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.6.1.08

Issue

Section

Research Articles