Abstract
Ceramic has limitation unique to its self. These limits are obstical for the ceramic students, both related to technic and its bounds to craft. Approaches of the educators about what the limits are and how students can relate to the limits, presents the practice of -not only ceramics but many art forms.
Ceramics relation to crafts and the material’s unique technical-content connections creates important and different points that can not be ignored in education. Criterias to concider increases when new point are added to the list such as contemporary art and conceptual art. Limits and creativity relations get more complicated accordingly. Educators has to think with the limits of both crafts, concepts of contemporary art and technics and lead the students to find their own voices and uniqueness. At the same time educators has to be supportive about the student’s pursuit of their own ways when they are trying to find their own solutions about the contradictive choices when they encounter a limit or an obsticle. This study thinks about the limits of art education and their relations with creativity through the examples of student works.
References
BENJAMIN, W., 1982, (A. Cemal,Çeviren, 2012) Pasajlar, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul
BOURRIAUD, N., 2003 , (S. Özen, Çeviren, 2005) İlişkisel Estetik , Bağlam Yayıncılık, Ankara
DELEUZE, G., 2006, (U. Baker, Çeviren, 2008), Spinoza Üzerine Onbir Ders, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul
O’DOHERTY, B. 2006, ( A. Antmen, Çeviren), Beyaz Küpün İçinde- Galeri Mekanının İdeolojsi, Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul
ROLLO, M. 1975, (A. Oysal , Çeviren, 2008), Yaratma Cesareti , Metis Yayınları, İstanbul
SHINER, L., 2001, (İ. Türkmen, Çeviren, 2017), Sanatın İcadı- Bir Kültürün Tarihi, İSTANBUL: Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul
TZARA, T., 1977, (E. Gökteke, Çeviren, 2004), DADA Manifestoları , Norgunk Yayıncılık, İstanbul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2018 Holistence Publications