Katılımcı Yöntemle Esenyurt’un Bugünü ve Geleceğinin Analizi: Sorunlar, Hedefler ve Stratejiler
Participatory method analysis of Esenyurt's present and future: Issues, goals, and strategies
Abstract views: 0
/ 
PDF downloads: 0
Abstract
Abstract
Based on data obtained through participatory processes and brain storming method, this study presents a framework on the current challenges faced by Istanbul's Esenyurt district and how it can realize its potential under the "New Municipalism Approach". The research examines various social, economic, and cultural challenges encountered by Esenyurt, including migration and refugee issues, increasing rates of youth crime, economic difficulties, inequalities in education, urban poverty, and the unfair distribution of social aids. The study advocates for concrete steps to overcome these issues by defining the district as the "City of Democracies Esenyurt", promoting social justice, ecological sustainability, and cultural diversity. It emphasizes the necessity of strong collaboration and dialogue between local governments, civil society, the private sector, and citizens to achieve a sustainable development model for Esenyurt. This approach aims to support the socio-economic and cultural advancement of the district
Keywords: Local Governance, Sustainable Development, Migration, Economic Challenges
Downloads
References
Lüküslü, D., & Osmanoğlu, B. (2018, Şubat 24). Youth Work in Turkey: A Sector Newly Emerging and Marked by Political Competition. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020031
Eranıl, A K. (2023, Ekim27). Dwelling Upon the Backstage of the Success of Rural Schools: A Systematic Review Analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(4), 832-852. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1324029
Bremer, J., & Bhuiyan, S. (2014, Ekim 1). Community-led infrastructure development in informal areas in urban Egypt: A case study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.07.004
Blümel, L., Siegfried, K., Riedel, F., & Thrän, D. (2023, Kasım 2). Are strategy developers well equipped when designing sustainable supply chains for a circular bio-economy? Supporting innovations’ market uptake in a PESTEL + I environment. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00415-2
Kurt, A. (2020, Eylül 29). Yerel Yönetimlerde Stratejik Planlama Sürecinde Karşılaşılan Yönetsel ve Kültürel Sorunlar: Bursa İl Özel İdaresi Örneği. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1315918
Green, L. W., & Mercer, S. L. (2001). Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?. American journal of public health, 91(12), 1926-1929.
Furnham, A. (2000). The brainstorming myth. Business strategy review, 11(4), 21-28.
Marshall, G. (1999). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
Sevim, N. H. (2008). Odak Grup Görüşmeleri. Sosyoloji Notları Dergisi, 80-86.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of health & illness, 1(16), 103-121.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Bmj,7000(311), 299-302.
Akdemir, A., Öztürk, H., Yıldız, B., & Türengül, M. (2023). Katılımcı Süreçlerle Kurumsal Kimlik Tasarımı ve Yankı A.Ş Örneği. Örgütlerin Yönetimine Yeni Yaklaşımlar: New Approaches to the Management of Organizations.
Çolluk, Ö., Yılmaz, K., & Oğuz, E. (2011). Nitel Bir Görüşme Yöntemi: Odak Grup Görüşmesi. Kuramsal Eğitim bilim, 1(4), 95-107.
Akdemir, A., Yıldız, B., & Aydın, O. (2021). Covid-19 etkisindeki iş dünyası temsilcilerinin nitel yöntemle sorun ve çözüm saptamalarının belirlenmesi. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 54-68.
Paulus, P. B., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2019). Effective brainstorming. The Oxford handbook of group creativity and
innovation, 287-305.
