The contribution of archaeoparks to cultural heritage awareness: The case of Bursa Hisar


Özet Görüntüleme: 82 / PDF İndirme: 64

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.2179

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Archaeoparks- Heritage Awarenes- Heritage Conservation- Sustainability- Bursa

Özet

The pressing need to protect archaeological sites amidst rapid urbanization is a global concern. These sites, vital to our cultural heritage, face threats from advancing urban development, especially in historically layered cities. Accurate understanding and contextualization of artifacts from various eras are crucial. Preservation efforts must extend beyond physical continuity and relics to include integration into urban socio-economic and socio-spatial contexts. This holistic approach aids in interpreting layered cities and promoting heritage awareness.

This study focuses on the ArchaeoPark initiatives in the Hisar Region, a significant part of Bursa’s cultural landscape. It serves as an example highlighting the importance of preserving archaeological sites and their original artifacts within urban environments. This preservation and display within the city enhance the awareness and understanding of both residents and visitors regarding these valuable cultural assets. Public participation in heritage conservation fosters greater recognition of the importance of these sites, leading to more sustainable preservation efforts.

Bursa and its surroundings are key archaeological sites in Anatolia, showcasing a layered urban history. The chosen Hisar region has the potential to unveil this history, becoming a vital cultural heritage area in Bursa.

After stressing the importance of urban archaeological heritage conservation, the study delves into pertinent conservation methods. It introduces Bursa as a significant cultural landscape, emphasizing ArchaeoPark activities and excavated artifacts in the Hisar region. Lastly, it offers recommendations to boost the role of Hisar ArchaeoPark in cultural heritage awareness and preservation.

This study aims to contribute to efforts focused on increasing cultural heritage awareness, which is a vital aspect of heritage conservation and management, despite being a time-consuming process. The conservation and presentation of archaeological sites within urban areas, exemplified by the ArchaeoPark in the Hisar Region, play a pivotal role in safeguarding our cultural heritage for future generations.

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

AHUNBAY, Z. (2009). Tarihi Çevrede Koruma ve Restorasyon, Yem yayınları, İstanbul.

AHUNBAY, Z. (2010). Arkeolojik Alanlarda Koruma Sorunları Kuramsal ve Yasal Açılardan Değerlendirme, TÜBAKED 8:103-118.

BAYRAKTAR, S. (2010). Kentsel Alanda Arkeolojik Park Tasarımı: Küçükyalı Ve Saraçhane Arkeolojik Parklarının Değerlendirilmesi, (Y.Lisans Tezi) İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi,İstanbul.

ERES, Z. (2009). Tarih Öncesi Kazı Alanlarında Koruma Ve Sergileme Kavramının Gelişimine Kısa Bir Bakış, TÜBAKED Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Kültür Envanteri Dergisi, 7/ 2009, 119-130.

ERES, Z. (2013). Arkeolojik Kazı, Koruma, Sergileme ve Toplum İlişkisi Kırklareli’nde Tarih öncesi Arkeolojik Alanlar Üzerinden Bir Deneyim, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi: 144

GEDİK, S., ERTUĞRAL, S, & TEKELİ, H.N. (2019). The Valuation Of The Archaeoparks in The Scope Of Cultural Heritage: Küçükyalı Arkeopark, International Journal Entrepreneurship and Management Inquiries, 3/ 5 pp:218 – 227.

ICOMOS, (1964). International Charters for Conservation and Restoration. ICOMOS, (1964). Venedik Tüzüğü (1964). http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ ICOMOSTR_ 0997208001496825715.pdf,[Access 10.08.2023].

ICOMOS,(1990). Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage / http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSR_en0574331001536913919.pdf[Access05.08.202.

KARABAĞ, N.E. (2010). Korumanın 20. Yüzyılda Değişen Kapsamı ve Kent Arkeolojisi Kavramının Gelişimi, Ege Mimarlık, 28-31.

KESKİN, Y. & TANAÇ ZEREN, M. (2018). Arkeolojik Alanlarda Bir Sunum Yöntemi Olarak “Arkeoparklar”, Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD), 3 (2), 110-124.DOI: 10.30785/mbud.439805

MADRAN, E. & ÖZGÖNÜL, N. (2005). Kültürel ve Doğal Değerlerin Korunması, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası, Ankara.

MCMANUS, P. (1999). Archaeological Parks: What are they?. Archaeology International, 3, 57-59, https://aijournal.com/articles/abstract/10.5334/ai.3017/ [Access 10.08.2023].

MİNİSTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURİSM (2009). Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Cultural and Natural Heritage High Council Decision Principles,Ankara).[Access15.08.2023] https://www.ktb.gov.tr/?_Dil=2

NAYCI & DEMİRDELEN (2018). Integrated Management of Archaeological and Rural Landscape: Feasibility Project for Gordion Archaeological Park, Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites, Simon Makuvaza Editor, Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-69855-7 ISBN 978-3-319-69856-4 (eBook).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4

NOCCA, F. (2017). The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool Sustainability,9(10),1882; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101882

SAVRUM-KORTANOĞLU, M. (2017) Kent Uzamında Arkeoloji, Colloquium Anatolicum,16.

SHANKAR, B., & SWAMY, C. (2013). Creating Awareness for Heritage Conservation in the City of Mysore: Issues and Policies, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 3, 698-703.

SRİVASTAVA, S. (2015), A Study of Awareness of Cultural Heritage among the Teachers at University Level, Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 3 No. 5, pp. 36–344.

TÜRKOĞLU, Ü. (2019). Experımental Archeology And Cultural Lıfe, Inonu Unıversıty Journal Of Culture And Art / Ijca, İnönü Üniversitesi Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, Volume/Cilt: 5 No/Sayı: 2 (2019) 66-74

URL-1. http://teftis.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,45471/37-nolu-ilke-karari-yerlesim- alanlarinda-mevcut-arkeolo-.html. [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-2. https://istanbultarihi.ist/15-istanbul-kazilari-marmaray-metro-projeleri-ve-arkeolojik-kurtarma-kazilarinin-sehir-tarihine-katkilari). [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-3. https://arkeopolis.com/kucukyali-arkeopark/ [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-4. https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/ldrbbi/the_famous_via_appia_the_appian_way_nowadays_rome/?rdt=35646 [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-5. https://www.penn.museum/sites/gordion/ [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-6. https://earth.google.com/web/search/BURSA,+H%c4%b0SAR/@40.30449385,29.09434045,327.17271841a,70914.32641521d,35y,360h,0. [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-7. https://www.osmangazi.bel.tr/tr/haber/sehrin-kalbinde-2-bin-400-yillik-zaman-yolculugu [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-8. https://www.bursa.com.tr/tr/mekan/hisar-arkeopark-33/ [Access 18.08.2023].

URL-9. https://www.osmangazi.bel.tr/tr/haber/yasayan-tarih-hisar-ici-projesine-ozel-odul- [Access 18.08.2023]

Yayınlanmış

2023-10-22

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Beceren Öztürk, R., & Çahantimur, A. (2023). The contribution of archaeoparks to cultural heritage awareness: The case of Bursa Hisar. JOURNAL OF AWARENESS, 8(4), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.2179

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makaleleri