Political economy of youth and youth-based budgeting proposal


Abstract views: 170 / PDF downloads: 98

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.2193

Keywords:

Political Economy of Youth, Youth-Based Budgeting, Heterodox Approaches, Mainstream Approaches

Abstract

The exacerbation of the problems experienced by young people in the last half century and the discussions on the use of youth labor lead to an increase in interest in research on youth. As a result of this interest, the political economy approach to youth problems offers an important perspective on the subject. Thus, it becomes possible to address the problems experienced by youth on a broad level. In this sense, the study examines the political economy of youth within the mainstream and heterodox approaches. Mainstream approaches focus more on the prolongation of young people's transition to adulthood, the problems young people face in their transition from education to business life, and the increase in inequality between generations. It aims to reduce the disadvantaged positions of young people in the face of these problems by trying to empower them. Heterodox approaches, on the other hand, associate the main source of the problems experienced by young people with the functioning mechanism of the economic system, within a critical framework. Thus, it aims to examine the youth issue not only as problems faced temporarily by the population in a certain age range, but also by establishing the relationship between these problems and the economic system.  In other words, the problems experienced by young people are caused by the capitalist operating mechanism itself. The unequal environment created by the dominant system leads to a decrease in the share of young people in the income distribution. The heterodox approach examines these issues within the context of deindustrialization, work intensification and youth labor as a result of neoliberal economic policies. From this point of view, it is important to examine the relationship between social relations and local dynamics that shape the economic, political, cultural and social areas of youth's living conditions in the context of the public budget. Therefore, this study examines the relationship between the public budget and the social position of youth within mainstream and heterodox approaches. In this context, the "youth-based budgeting concept" proposal is developed as a means of making young people visible. Youth-based budget suggests that budget programs and policies should be organized on a youth-based basis, the reflections of this should be examined systematically, and resource distribution within the public sphere should be organized on a youth-based basis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hilmiye Yasemin Özuğurlu, Mersin University / Turkey

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ/İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ/MALİYE BÖLÜMÜ/MALİ İKTİSAT ANABİLİM DALI

References

ASLAN, S. (2014). Gençliğin Pozitif Gelişimi: ABD Illinois Eyaleti Örneği. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 81-101.

BAĞLI, M. S. (2012). Teorik Ve Tarihsel Açıdan Bütçe Hakkı. Yasama Dergisi, 20(1), 39-77.

BESSANT, J. (2003). Youth participation: a new mode of government. Policy studies, 24(2-3), 87-100.

BOYD, M., & NORRİS, D. (1999). The crowded nest: Young adults at home. Canadian Social Trends, 52, 2-5.

BUHEJİ, M. (2018). Handbook of Youth Economy. Author House.

COLOMBO, E., & REBUGHİNİ, P. (2019). Youth and the Politics of the Present: Coping with Complexity and Ambivalence, Taylor & Francis.

CÔTÉ, J. E. (2014). Towards a new political economy of youth. Journal Of Youth Studies, 17(4), 527-543.

CLARK, W. (2007). Delayed transitions of young adults. Canadian Social Trends, 84, 14-2

DAMON, W. (2004). What is positive youth development?. The Annals of the American Academy of political and social science, 591(1), 13-24.

DENSTAD, F. Y. (2009). Youth Policy Manual: How to develop a national youth strategy. Council of Europe.

DİKMEN C. (2015). Cinsiyete Duyarlı Bütçeleme Ve Türkiye Uygulaması. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, SBE. 2015. İzmir.

DUFFY, S. (2019). Meaningful Transitions: How Education Shapes Young Working Class İndividuals’ Perceptions Of Work in Austerity Scotland ,Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow.

DÜZGÜNER, S. (2015). Değişen Dünyada Gençlik ve Değerler. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 105-126.

ERKAN, B. ŞENTÜRK, M. AKBAŞ, Y. & PAKSOY, S. (2012). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Bütçeleme (Cinsiyete Duyarlı Bütçe) Yaklaşımı. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (9).

EUROSTAT, (2023 a). Share of young adults aged 18-34 living with their parents by self-defined current economic status- EU-SILC survey https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ILC_LVPS09/default/table?lang=en [Erişim tarihi: 20/07/2023]

EUROSTAT, (2023b). Young people neither in employment nor in education and training by sex, age and labour status (NEET rates). https://ec. europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/EDAT_LFSE_20/default/table?lang=en. [Erişim Tarihi: 21/07/2023]

FARRUGİA, D. (2021). Youth, work and global capitalism: new directions. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(3), 372-387.

FRANCE, A. & THREADGOLD, S. (2016). Youth and political economy: Towards a Bourdieusian approach. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(5), 612-628.

GENÇ, M, (2010). Toplumsal cinsiyete duyarlı bütçeleme ve kamu hizmetlerinde etkinlik. Sayıştay Dergisi, (77), 33-62.

GÖZE, F. E. & YILMAZ, E. Neoliberalizm, Genç İşsizliği ve Sosyal Güvensizlik Bağlamında Sinemada Gençliğin Temsili: American Honey.

KEATING, A. & MELİS, G. (2022). Youth attitudes towards their future: the role of resources, agency and individualism in the UK. Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 5(1), 1-18.

KELLY, P. (2018). Three Notes On A Political Economy of Youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(10), 1283-1304.

KONUKMAN, A. (2015). Türkiye’de bütçe hakkının kullanımı: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 23-65.

KUZNETSOVA, O. & KUZNETSOV, A. (2020). And Then There Were None: What A UCU Archive Tells Us About Employee Relations in Marketising Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2439-2450.

MAZURIK, K. (2022). The Repertoires of Relatedness: Understanding the Parent-Child Relationships of Young Adults Who Live at Home, Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewa.

MİRANDA, A. & ALFREDO, M. A. (2022). Transitions in the post-pandemic COVID-19 context: building youth policies in the Global South. Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 1-15.

MURAT, S. (1995). Gençlerin İşsizliğine Genel Bir Bakış. In Journal of Social Policy Conferences No. 40, pp. 175-194.

MURAT, S.&ŞAHİN, L. (2011). Gençlerin istihdamı/işsizliği bakımından Türk Eğitim Sisteminin değerlendirilmesi. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3(30), 93-135.

MURPHY, E. C. (2017). A political economy of youth policy in Tunisia. New Political Economy, 22(6), 676-691.

OECD (2008), Are we growing unequal?

O'GRADY, T. (2022). Is ideological polarisation by age group growing in Europe?. European Journal of Political Research.

PACİELLO, M. C. (2012). The Political Economy of Youth Exclusion in the Mediterranean: Continuity or Change. Op-Med: Opinions on the Mediterranean ,June 2012. The German Marshal Fund of the United States.

PİMLOTT‐WİLSON, H. (2017). Individualising The Future: The Emotional Geographies of Neoliberal Governance in Young People's Aspirations. Area, 49(3), 288-295.

REITER, H. (2003). Past, Present, Future: Biographical Time Structuring Of Disadvantaged Young People. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 11(3), 253-279.

RENÇBER, N.(2020) Toplumsal Cinsiyete Duyarlı Bütçeleme ve Türkiye’de Merkezi Yönetim Bütçesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBE. 2020. Ankara.

ROBERTS, K. (2021). Education-to-work transitions during the Covid-19 lockdowns in Britain, 2020-2021. Advances in Applied Sociology, 11(11), 564-584.

ROWNTREE, J., and M. ROWNTREE. (1968). The Political Economy of Youth. Our Generation, 6: 155–190.

SİKA, N. (2021). Beyond the Impasse? Dynamics of youth agency in times of crisis. Mediterranean Politics, 26(3), 273-284.

SUKARIEH, M. & TANNOCK, S. (2014). Youth Risling? The Politics Of Youth in The Global Economy. Routledge.

SUKARIEH, M. & TANNOCK, S. (2016). On the political economy of youth: A comment. Journal Of Youth Studies, 19(9), 1281-1289.

SULTANA, N., & RAHMAN, M. A. (2022). Institutional Assistance and Adaptation of Fresh Graduates Facing Employment Crisis and Poverty. Journal of Business Studies, 3(1), 119–143

ÜLTANIR, E. (2021). Yükseköğretimde Pandemi Koşullarında Mezunların İstihdam Edilebilirliği ve Uzaktan Kariyer Rehberliği. IHEC 2021, 112-120.

WYN, J. and WHİTE, R(1997). Rethinking Youth, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

YAMAN, A. (2021). Kamu politikası analizi bağlamında Türkiye’nin gençlik politikası. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (10), 45-71.

YATES, E. (2021). Work, employment and the material conditions of young people in developed economies: a Marxist political economy of youth perspective. Journal of Youth Studies, 1-16.

Published

2023-10-24

How to Cite

Kaplan, M. M., & Özuğurlu, H. Y. (2023). Political economy of youth and youth-based budgeting proposal. JOURNAL OF LIFE ECONOMICS, 10(4), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.2193

Issue

Section

Research Articles