Who benefits from local government budget expenditures in Turkey? (2006-2020)


Abstract views: 107 / PDF downloads: 218

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.8.4.07

Keywords:

Social Profit, Social Wage, Public Expenditures, Local Governments

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how the local governments expenditures are allocated among social classes in the period between 2006 and 2020 in Turkey. For this purpose, two explanatory concepts are used. These are the concepts of social profit and social wage. The social profit refers to the resources transferred from local governments expenditures to the income or the consumption of the capital class. The social wage, on the other hand, shows the contributions made to the income or consumption of the working class from the local governments expenditures. The classification of local governments expenditures based on these two concepts allows to determine the resource uses of the local governments, which transform into the social profit and the social wages. The findings in this study reveal that while an average of 70 percent of the expenditures of local governments in Turkey is allocated to the income or the consumption of the capital class, the contribution made by the local governments to the income or the consumption of the working class is around 30 percent. These results reveal that the interests of the capital class dominate the budget politics of local governments in Turkey.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARIN, T. (1997). Anayasal İktisat ve Refah Devleti: TİSK ve TÜSİAD’ın Asgari Devlet Raporlarının Eleştirisi, Ekonomide Durum. Bahar-Yaz, 41-106.

BRENNAN, G. ve BUCHANAN, J. M. (1980). Power to Tax: Analytical Foundation of A Fiscal Constutition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Birinci Baskı, ISBN: 0 521-233291

MILLER, J. A. (1989). Social Wage or Social Profit? The Net Social Wage and the Welfare State. Review of Radical Political Economics. 21 (3), 82- 90.

MUELLER, C. D. (1993). The Growth of Government: A Public Choice Perspective. içinde The Public Choice Approch to Politics, Editör: D. C. Mueller. 365-398, England: Edward Edgar Publishing Company, Birinci Baskı, ISBN: 1 1 85278 805 4.

O’CONNOR, J. (1973). The Fiscal Crisis of The State. New York: St.Martin’s Press, Dördüncü Baskı, ISBN: 978-0-7658-0860-8

MGM (2021a). Mahalli İdareler Konsolide Bütçe Harcama İstatistikleri. Ankara: Muhasebat Genel Müdürlüğü, https://muhasebat.hmb.gov.tr/mahalli-idareler-butce-istatistikleri [Erişim Tarihi: 20/06/2021].

MGM (2021b). Genel Yönetim Sektörü Bütçe Harcama İstatistikleri. Ankara: Muhasebat Genel Müdürlüğü, https://muhasebat.hmb.gov.tr/mahalli-idareler-butce-istatistikleri [Erişim Tarihi: 20/06/2021].

SHAIKH, A ve TONAK, E. A. (2012) [1994]. Milletlerin Zenginliğinin Ölçülmesi Ulusal Hesapların Ekonomi Politiği. Çeviren H. Arslan. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap, Birinci Baskı, ISBN: 978-605-5541-61-3.

ŞENGÜL, H. T. (2003). Yerel Devlet Sorunu ve Yerel Devletin Dönüşümünde Yeni Eğilimler. Praksis Dergisi. 9 (Kış-Bahar), 183-220.

TONAK, E. A. (2012) [1985]. Kapitalist Devlet Karşısında İşçi Sınıfı: ABD Örneği. içinde Kapitalin İzinde. Editörler: N. Satlıgan, S. Sarvan & E. A. Tonak. 341-377, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap, Birinci Baskı, ISBN: 978-605-5541-74-3.

TÜİK, (2021a). Gelir Yöntemiyle Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hâsıla. Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=ulusal-hesaplar-113&dil=1 [Erişim Tarihi: 20/06/2021].

TÜİK, (2021b). Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması. Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=gelir-yasam-tuketim-ve-yoksulluk-107&dil=1 [Erişim Tarihi: 20/06/2021].

Published

2021-10-31

How to Cite

Nacar, B. (2021). Who benefits from local government budget expenditures in Turkey? (2006-2020). JOURNAL OF LIFE ECONOMICS, 8(4), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.8.4.07

Issue

Section

Research Articles