Dynamics affecting renewable energy: A panel quantile regression approach


Abstract views: 154 / PDF downloads: 170

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53753/jame.2.1.01

Keywords:

Renewable Energy, Economic Growth, Economic Factors, Panel Quantile Regression

Abstract

The effective use of energy resources, energy production and consumption are accepted as one of the most basic indicators of development in recent years. It has become important to use these energy resources in an environmentally friendly manner and have a positive and efficient effect on the economy. The relationship between renewable energy consumption (LREC) and economic factors such as growth rate of GDP per capita (LGDP)), fixed capital investment (LFCI), total labor (LTL), total amount of waste per capita (LWCA) is examined in this study. Data on those variables are collected for the period of 2012-2020 for OECD countries. A panel quantile regression approach method is employed to examine the association between renewable energy consumption (REC) and economic factors. The effects of independent variables on renewable consumption have been interpreted depending on the estimation results obtained in the analysis. Firstly, the panel unit root tests are determined for stationarity. As a result, a panel quantile approach is adopted. The results of the analysis show that all economic variables used in the model have a statistically significant effect on renewable energy consumption in the last two quantiles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADEBEYO, T.S, RJOUP, H. & AKINSOLA, G.D. (2022). The Asymmetric Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption And Trade Openness on Carbon Emissions in Sweden: New Evidence From Quantile-On-Quantile Regression Approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(2):1875-1886. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15706-4. Epub 2021 Aug 6. PMID: 34363156.

DALY, H.E. (1973). Toward a Steady-State Economy. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co Ltd.

DALY, H. E. (2007). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development: Selected Essays of Herman Daly. Celtenham, UK; Northampton, USA: E. Elgar.

BPS, (2014). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2021 Report. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview.

BALTAGI, H. (2005). Econometric Analysis for Panel Data. England: John Wiley & Sons.

CAUTISANU, C. & ASANDULUI, L. & BORZA, M. & TURTUREAN, C. (2018). Quantitative Approach to Circular Economy in the OECD Countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 20, 262-277. 10.24818/EA/2018/48/262.

CANAY, I.A. (2011). A Simple Approach to Quantile Regression for Panel Data. Econometrics Journal, 14, 368–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2011.00349.x.

CARAIANI, C., LUNGU, C. & DASCĂLU, C. (2015). Energy Consumption and GDP Causality: A Three-Step Analysis for Emerging European Countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 198–210.

CHATZISIDERIS, M.D., LAURENT, A., CHRISTOFORIDIS, G.C. & KREBS, F.C. (2017). Cost-Competitiveness of Organic Photovoltaics for Electricity Self-Consumption at Residential Buildings: A Comparative Study of Denmark and Greece Under Real Market Conditions. Applied. Energy, 208, 471–479.

GEORGE, D. A., LIN, B. C.-ang. & CHEN, Y. (2015). A Circular Economy Model of Ecoomic Growth. Environmental Modelling and Software, 73, 60-63.

GURIS, S. & CAGLAYAN, E. (2010). Ekonometri: Temel Kavramlar. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.

INGLESI-LOTZ, R. (2015). The Impact of Renewable Energy Consumption to Economic Growth: A Panel Data Application. Energy Economics, 53, 58–63.

INSTITUTE MONTAIGNE. (2016). The Circular Economy: Reconciling Economic Growth with the Environment. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/ressources/pdfs/publications/policypaper-circular-economy.pdf.

IRENA (2013). Renewable Energy Generation Costs in 2012: An Overview. International Renewable Energy Agency Report, Bonn.

KRAFT, J. & KRAFT, A. (1978) On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP. Journal of Energy and Development, 3: 401–403.

KOENKER, R. & BASSETT, G. (1978) Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33-50.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913643.

KOENKER, R & HALLOCK, K. (2001). Quantile Regression LSE Short Course, CEMMAP and University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 16-17 May 2011.

NARAYAN, PK. & SMYTH, R. (2008) Energy Consumption and Real GDP in G7 Countries: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration with Structural Breaks. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2331-2341.

ODHIAMBO, N.M. (2009). Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Tanzania: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Energy Policy, 37(2), 617-22.

OH, W. & LEE, K. (2004). Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970–1999. Energy economics, 26(1), 51-59.

SPURGEON, R. & FLOOD, M. (2010), Enerji ve Güç, TÜBİTAK Popüler Bilim Kitapları, Ankara.

PEARCE, D. & TURNER, R.K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Baltimore: The Johns University Press

Downloads

Published

2022-06-24

How to Cite

Dayıoğlu, T. (2022). Dynamics affecting renewable energy: A panel quantile regression approach. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROECONOMETRICS, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.53753/jame.2.1.01

Issue

Section

Original Article