NAPOLEON'S PARADOX AND THE RUSSIAN IDEA OF LAW IN DOSTOEVSKY'S CRIME AND PUNISHMENT. THE IRRATIONAL / THE RATIONAL
Abstract views: 0 / PDF downloads: 0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33390/ijla.2042Keywords:
Raskolnikov's Bonapartism, phenomenology of crime and punishment, sentimental consciousness, repentanceAbstract
The paper presents an experience of a phenomenological study of the irrational/rational in the theory of law in Dostoyevsky's novel «Crime and Punishment». The object of analysis in the paper is the anthropocentricity of Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment". It straddles the boundary between the irrational and the rational, encompassing the philosophical and sociological aspects of law. The correlation between the irrational and the rational - as a correlation between the philosophical and the sociological in the hero's theory of law in the novel - has not become a subject of study in terms of Raskolnikov's resentful consciousness. The promising nature of the theme is also due to the possibility of studying the Russian paradox, revealed in the hero's Bonapartism as a Russian idea of law. An analysis of law as the central question of the writer's philosophical and artistic outlook and worldview needs to distinguish between the ontological and the sociological. In addition, Dostoevsky's philosophical views, religious and moral convictions and philosophical anthropology determined the basic principles of the metaphysics of the individual and his legal consciousness. The different sides of the irrational and the rational are focused around Napoleon's paradox, deployed in the Russian idea of law. The paper is devoted to a description of Raskolnikov's Bonapartism as the source of the Russian idea of law. The paper differentiates between the irrational and the rational in legal theory. As an irrational nature, resentment consciousness and the relationship of freedom/conscience and individual morality to it are explored. The hero's delusion, his 'powerlessness' in the ontological and religious sense, is analysed as value concepts of resentment consciousness. The article categorises the characters according to the characteristics of resentment consciousness and on the basis of the dichotomy "mean person" / "mean" value consciousness. The dual treatment of crime and punishment, in its ethical and criminal nature, is examined as the source of two types of conceptualization of death, from a physical and metaphysical perspective. The confrontation of the ethical in the phenomenology of crime has become a justification for the hero and levels the criminal meaning of the crime. There is a strong sense of the priority given to repentance and the absence of repentance as major concepts in Orthodox axiology.
The significance of the problem under consideration lies in the study of the specifics of the formation of the philosophical and religious concept of Russian reality and the Russian idea in the works of Dostoevsky as a feature of his philosophical and artistic method. The novelty of the work lies in the use of a phenomenological approach to describe the ontological and sociological aspects of legal theory, in correlation with the category of consciousness.
Downloads
References
BARSOTTI, D. (1999). Dostoevsky. Christ the Passion of Life. Moscow: Paoline, ISBN: 2619-0311
BAKHTIN, M. (2002). Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics // Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works: In 7 vols., Т. 6. М:Russkiye slovari: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, ISBN: 5-98010-001-6
BERDYAEV, N. (1995). The Kingdom of the Spirit and the Kingdom of Caesar. - Moscow: The Republic, ISBN: 978-5-413-02282-5
DNEPROVSKAYA, I. (2011). Metaphysics of Crime in the Philosophy of F.M. Dostoevsky: Person in Search of Authenticity of Being // Solovyov's Studies. 3 (31), 46-60.
ESAULOV, I. and others. (2021). Analysis, Interpretation and Understanding in the Study of Dostoevsky's Legacy: A Collective Monograph. Moscow: Indrik, ISBN: 978-5-91674-631-0
KOVALEVSKAYA, T. (2012). Human Godliness in Dostoevsky and the Problem of Self-Deification in European Culture // Dostoevsky and World Culture. Almanac, 28, 74-87.
MEREZHKOVSKY, D. (1995). Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Eternal Companions. Moscow: Respublika Publisher, ISBN: 5-02-011599-1.
RAZUMOVSKAYA, V. (2018). Russian cultural information in "strong" texts of literature and their translations: the case of F.M. Dostoevsky, https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/16675. [Date of reference: 21.12.2022].
ROZANOV, V. On Dostoevsky (1990) // On Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky's Work in Russian Thought in 1881-1921: Collected Papers. - Moscow: Kniga, ISBN: 5-210-00101-6.
STEPCHENKOVA, V. (2022).Value dominants in the motive structure of F.M. Dostoevsky's novel "The Brothers Karamazov". Abstract and dissertation on Russian literature. Moscow state region university.
TABACHNIKOVA, O. (2022). Dostoevsky in an English-speaking audience: the experience of teaching Crime and Punishment to British students Slavica Literaria /https://doi.org/10.5817/SL2022-1-4, [Date of reference: 21.12.2022].
URAZAYEVA, K. (2022). Communicative ontology of A. Pushkin in Odessa lyrics. "Impressions of Being" and the text as the author's otherness". SlavVaria, 1, 129-140. DOI: 10.15170/SV.1/2022.
ZHANG, B. (Beijing, China). (2021). Manifestations of the hidden sacred order in Dostoevsky's work (On the question of double reality in F.M. Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment"). SlavVaria. № 1. 45-52. DOI: 10.15170/SV.1/2021.45. [Date of reference: 21.12.2022].
SCHELLER, M. (1999). Resentment in the Structure of Morals. SPb.: Nauka, University Book, ISBN: 5-02-026812-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Holistence Publications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When the article is accepted for publication in the HOMEROS, authors transfer all copyright in the article to the Rating Academy Ar-Ge Yazılım Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık ve Organizasyon Ticaret Ltd. Şti.The authors reserve all proprietary right other than copyright, such as patent rights.
Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.
This paper contains works that have not previously published or not under consideration for publication in other journals.