On the way to the AI era: The view of health sciences faculty department students on AI and technological unemployment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.2696Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, technology, unemployment, vocational training, studentsAbstract
As artificial intelligence-supported technologies begin to develop rapidly in the health sector, as in other fields, the concern that the need for professionals will decrease has brought about concerns about unemployment. This study aims to determine the health department students' perspective on artificial intelligence and their anxiety about technological unemployment. Artificial intelligence is developing today mainly in information technologies, and it is expected that professions that are application-based and require personalized interventions will be less affected. For this reason, four departments that are thought to be least and most affected by artificial intelligence development were taken. In this direction, the sample size was determined to be at least n=196 (each group n=49) with an effect size of 0.30, a margin of error of 0.05, a confidence level of 0.95, and a representative power of 0.95 universe, and the study was completed with n=206 participants. 86.89% of the participants (n=179) were female, and the age range was between 18 and 38. It was determined that the students studying in the department of exercise and sports sciences had the highest technological unemployment anxiety with 35.41, while the students studying in the department of midwifery had the lowest technological unemployment anxiety with 29.64. As a result of the study, it can be concluded that increasing anxiety about technological unemployment affects readiness for artificial intelligence. It is thought that providing students with information on how artificial intelligence can affect their professions and how this technology can be used, as well as practical courses such as artificial intelligence command language and robotics, will help reduce the anxiety of technology-related unemployment.
Downloads
References
Özel G, Aba YA. The invisible face of technology: Technostress in nursing profession [in Turkish]. JGEHES. 2023;5(2):258-74. doi: 10.51123/jgehes.2023.91.
Akçakanat Ö. The impact of artificial intelligence anxiety on technology-induced unemployment concerns: A study on accounting professionals [in Turkish]. KOCATEPEİİBFD. 2024;26(Special Issue):53-67. doi: 10.33707/akuiibfd.1458358.
Turkaya A, Özdemir EB. The effect of the use of artificial ıntelligence technologies on the digital literacy levels of associate degree students [in Turkish]. J Uni Res. 2024;7(4):459-72. doi: 10.32329/uad.1486583.
Eşkin Bacaksız F, Yılmaz M, Ezizi K, Alan H. Managing robots in healthcare [in Turkish]. SHYD. 2020;3(7):458-65. doi: 10.5222/SHYD.2020.59455.
Copeland BJ. Artifical intellegence. Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence. (Accessed on Jan 03, 2025).
Bali J, Garg R, Bali RT. Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and biomedical research: Why a strong computational/AI bioethics framework is required? Indian J Ophthal. 2019;67:3-6. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1292_18.
Gümüş E, Uysal Kasap E. The level of artificial ıntelligence anxiety in the health ecosystem: A sample of nurses [in Turkish]. J Art Intel Health Sci. 2022;2(3):1-7. doi: 10.52309/jaihs.v2i2.43.
Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. Retrieved from https://sozluk.gov.tr/. (Accessed on Jan 03,2025).
Karaoğlan Yılmaz FG, Yılmaz R. Adaptation of artificial intelligence literacy scale into Turkish [in Turkish]. J Inf Comm Techn. 2023;5(2):172-90. doi: 10.53694/bited.1376831.
Becker A. Artificial intelligence in medicine: What is it doing for us today? HPT. 2019;8(2):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.03.004.
Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019;6(2):94-8. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
Park CW, Seo SW, Kang N, Ko B, Choi BW, Park CM, et al. Artificial intelligence in health care: Current applications and issues. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(42). doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e379.
Çalışkan SA, Karaca O, Demir K. Are healthcare workers ready for artificial intelligence? [in Turkish]. J Art Intel Health Sci. 2021;1(1):35. doi: 10.52309/jai.2021.6.
Özbek Güven G, Yılmaz Ş, İnceoğlu F. Determining medical students' anxiety and readiness levels about artificial intelligence. Heliyon. 2024;10(4). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25894.
Tarcan GY, Balçık PY, Sebik NB. Artificial intelligence in healthcare in Türkiye and the World [in Turkish]. Lokman Hekim J. 2024;14(1):50-60. doi: 10.31020/mutftd.1278529.
Pepito JA, Locsin R. Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future? Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6(1):106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.09.013.
Barbounaki S, Vivilaki VG. Intelligent systems in obstetrics and midwifery: Applications of machine learning. Eur J Midwery. 2021;5:58. doi: 10.18332/ejm/143166.
Kranz A, Abele H. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on midwifery education: A scoping review. Healthcare. 2024;12(11):1082. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111082.
Ülker İ, Çamli A. Artificial Intelligence in nutrition and dietetics applications [in Turkish]. J Nutr Diet. 2023;51(2):76-84. doi: 10.33076/2023.BDD.1730.
Reis FJ, Alaiti RK, Vallio CS, Hespanhol L. Artificial intelligence and machine-learning approaches in sports: Concepts, applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Brazilian J Phys Therapy. 2024;101083. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101083.
Murat G, Şengül B. Impacts of artificial intelligence on employment: Universal basic income as a social policy measure [in Turkish]. J Soc Policy Conf. 2023;85:199-213. doi: 10.26650/jspc.2023.85.1331159.
Sheikhi M. The Impact of artificial intelligence use on the business market [in Turkish]. J Econ Polit Sci. 2022;2(1):102-11.
Şendir M, Şimşekoğlu N, Kaya A, Sümer K. Nursing in future technology [in Turkish]. University of Health Sciences J Nursing. 2019;1(3):209-14.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Meth. 2009;41:1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Karaca O, Çalışkan SA, Demir K. Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) – development, validity and reliability study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6.
Civelek ME, Pehlivanoğlu Ç. Technological unemployment anxiety scale development. EASEBE. 2020;22:64-76. doi: 10.17740/eas.econ.2020.V22-05.
Alpar R. Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik [in Turkish]. 6nd Edition, Ankara, Detay Yayıncılık. 2020;333-361.
Yılmaz Y, Yılmaz DU, Yıldırım D, Korhan EA, Kaya DÖ. Artificial intelligence and the use of artificial intelligence in health: Opinions of health sciences students [in Turkish]. Süleyman Demirel University J Health Sci. 2021;12(3):297-308. doi: 10.22312/sdusbed.950372.
Demir Kaymak Z, Turan Z, Unlu Bidik N, Unkazan S. Effects of midwifery and nursing students' readiness about medical artificial ıntelligence on artificial intelligence anxiety. Nurs Educ Pract. 2024;103994. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103994.
Labrague LJ, Aguilar Rosales R, Yboa BC, Sabio J B. Factors influencing student nurses' readiness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in their studies and their perceived barriers to accessing AI technology: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Educ Today. 2023;130:105945. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105945.
Obiekwe SJ, Omaga IB, Ukadike MM, Edeh CG, Iheanyi CE, Anisiobi PU, et al. The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional study on the knowledge, perception, and readiness of medical students at a tertiary institution in Nigeria. Apollo Med. 2024;09760016241287301. doi: 10.1177/097600162412873.
Ergin E, Karaarslan D, Şahan S, Bingöl Ü. Can artificial intelligence and robotic nurses replace operating room nurses? The quasi-experimental research. J Robotic Surg. 2023;17(4), 1847-55. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01592-0.
Ergin E, Karaarslan D, Şahan S, Çınar Yücel Ş. Artificial intelligence and robot nurses: From nurse managers' perspective: A descriptive cross‐sectional study. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(8):3853-62. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13646.
Doğaner A. The approaches and expectations of the health sciences students towards artificial intelligence. Karya J Health Sci. 2021;2(1):5-11.
Güzel Ş, Dömbekci HA, Eren F. The Use of artificial intelligence in the health institutions: A qualitative research [in Turkish]. Manisa Celal Bayar University J Inst Health Sci. 2022;9(4):509-19. doi: 10.34087/cbusbed.1140122.
Reyhan Aktaş F, Dağlı E. Evaluation of midwifery students' anxiety regarding artificial intelligence used in the field of health. J Health Sci Inst. 2023;8(Special Issue):290-6. doi: 10.51754/cusbed.1286594.
Rony MKK, Parvin MR, Wahiduzzaman M, Debnath M, Bala SD, Kayesh I. I wonder if my years of training and expertise will be devalued by machines: Concerns about the replacement of medical professionals by artificial intelligence. SAGE Open Nur. 2024;10:23779608241245220. doi: 10.1177/23779608241245220.
Uçar M, Çapuk H, Yiğit MF. The relationship between artificial intelligence anxiety and unemployment anxiety among university students. WORK. 2024;0(0). doi: 10.1177/10519815241290648.
Gherheş V. Why are we afraid of artificial intelligence (AI)? Eur Rev App Soc. 2018;11(17):6-15. doi: 10.1515/eras-2018-0006.
Bordot F. Artificial intelligence, robots and unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries. J Innov Econ Manag. 2022;37(1):117-38. doi: 10.3917/jie.037.0117.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Holistence Publications

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.

