Post-traumatic stress disorder and expert testimony: Deficiencies identified by the Supreme Court
Abstract views: 134
/ 
PDF downloads: 77
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.2602Keywords:
post-traumatic stress disorder, expert witness, forensic psychiatry, causality, permanenceAbstract
Post-traumatic stress disorder is a topic frequently addressed to expert witnesses by the courts. This study aims to identify expert weaknesses by analyzing judicial decision texts in which a first-instance court decision was reversed due to flaws discovered in the evaluation of post-traumatic stress disorder by experts in the Supreme Court database. The case law decisions made by both penal and civil chambers relating to post-traumatic stress disorder between the years 2007 and 2022 were studied utilizing the database of the Turkish Court of Cassation. Of the 300 higher court decisions analyzed, 130 (43.3%) were penal chamber decisions and 170 (56.7%) were civil chamber decisions. The most often noted weakness in expert-written reports is the lack of causality evaluations (n=150; 50%). The second most common defect in judicial decisions is the lack of specialists who ought to participate on the evaluation board (n=79; 26.3%). Experts who assess this matter are known to make mistakes or inadequacies while writing reports, particularly with regard to the remarks on permanence and causality. These flaws and/or mistakes have the potential to traumatize the victim of the occurrence in question through repeated examinations and to lengthen the legal proceedings.
Downloads
References
Brett EA, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. DSM-III-R criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(10):1232-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.10.1232.
Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Skodol AE. DSM-III: the major achievements and an overview. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(2):151-64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.2.151.
Stone AA. Post-traumatic stress disorder and the law: Critical review of the new frontier. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(1):23-36.
Şenol E, Meral O, Sertöz ÖÖ, Altıntoprak AE, Coşkunol H, Güler H. Evaluation of forensic psychiatric report for sexual assault cases [in Turkish]. Adli Tıp Bul. 2016;21(3):159–66. doi: 10.17986/blm.2016323749.
Kaya A, Aktaş EÖ. The concept of mental health impairment in the light of the decisions of the higher judicial bodies. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2014;25. doi: 10.5080/u7495.
Bottalico B, Bruni T. Post traumatic stress disorder, neuroscience, and the law. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012;35(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.12.001.
Erkman FT, Tümer AR, Akçan R. Assessment of maltreatment in forensic traumatology through a case report. Bull Leg Med. 2022;27(2):212-7. doi: 10.17986/blm.1561.
Soğukpınar VO, Tabo A, Gürpınar K. Evaluation of persons diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder in injuries developed due to events other than work accidents in terms of loss of profession [in Turkish]. J For Med. 2023;37(3):100–7. doi: 10.61970/adlitip.1262125.
Yiğit M, Eryiğit İbiş C, Dinçer M. Disability and Handicap in Psychiatric Cases [in Turkish]. In: Aliustaoğlu FS, editor. Türk Hukuk Sisteminde Adli Psikiyatrik Bilirkişilik. 1st ed. Ankara, Türkiye: Türkiye Klinikleri Adli Tıp; 2024. 82-6 p.
Ünaldı ŞT, Poyraz T, Bora İE, Can İÖ. Evaluation of the cases admitted to the disability board after a traffic accidental head trauma, in terms of neuropsychiatric sequelae. Bull Leg Med. 2023;28(3):280-8. doi: 10.17986/blm.1648.
Yıldırım MŞ, Koç Yıldırım S. Insights from the supreme court decisions: Undesirable consequences after minimally invasive cosmetic interventions in Türkiye. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;0:1-5. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16588.
T.C. Yargıtay (2024, Aug 6). Court of Cassation (Web page). Retrieved from: https://www.yargitay.gov.tr/
T.C. Yargıtay (2024, Aug 6). Yargıtay Karar Arama (Web page). Retrieved from: http://karararama.yargitay.gov.tr
Jamovi. The jamovi project (Version 2.4) [Computer software] [Internet]. 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.jamovi.org
Kılıç S, Sezer F, Cantürk G. Bipolar disorder due to subdural hematoma: A case report. Bull Leg Med. 2017;22(2):151-3. doi: 10.17986/blm.2017227924.
Can İÖ, Demiroğlu Uyanıker Z, Ulaş H, Karabağ G, Cimili C, Salaçin S. Mental findings in trauma victims. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2012;49(1):230-6. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6242.
TurkStat (2024, Aug 6). Road Traffic Accident Statistics 2024 (Web page). Retrieved from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Karayolu-Trafik-Kaza-Istatistikleri-2023-53479
Boumpa V, Papatoukaki A, Kourti A, Mintzia S, Panagouli E, Bacopoulou F, et al. Sexual abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder in childhood, adolescence and young adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024;33(6):1653-73. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-02015-5.
Rowan AB, Foy DW. Post-traumatic stress disorder in child sexual abuse survivors: A literature review. J Trauma Stress. 1993;6(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02093359.
Pitman RK, Orr SP. Psychophysiologic testing for post-traumatic stress disorder: Forensic psychiatric application. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(1):37–51.
Grey BJ. Implications of neuroscience advances in tort law: A general overview. Indiana Health Law Rev. 2015;12(2):671. doi: 10.18060/3911.0005.
Grey BJ. Neuroscience, emotional harm, and emotional distress tort claims. Am J Bioeth. 2007;7(9):65-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160701518813.
Villalta L, Khadr S, Chua K-C, Kramer T, Clarke V, Viner RM, et al. Complex post-traumatic stress symptoms in female adolescents: The role of emotion dysregulation in impairment and trauma exposure after an acute sexual assault. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020;11(1). doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1710400.
Sachser C, Keller F, Goldbeck L. Complex PTSD as proposed for ICD-11: Validation of a new disorder in children and adolescents and their response to Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(2):160-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12640.
Karbeyaz K, Gündüz T, Balcı Y, Akkaya H. The sexual abuse cases assessment after the New Turkish Criminal Code; in Eskişehir [in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2009;6(1):1–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Holistence Publications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.
