Measurement of the basic anatomy knowledge and the satisfaction of students taking an anatomy course with video-animation support
Abstract views: 126
/ 
PDF downloads: 96
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.2598Keywords:
Anatomy, animation, distance education, questionnaireAbstract
This experimental study was conducted to determine the self-efficacy perception and distance learning satisfaction of Kozaklı Vocational School students receiving animation-supported anatomy education. The study was conducted on 225 students who took active lessons in the distance education process using the student information form, Distance Education Assessment and Anatomy Self-Efficacy Questionnaires via Google form. It was determined that 51.7% of the participants lived in the city center, 31.8% in the district center, and 16.6% in the countryside. In this study, the total distance education satisfaction score was calculated as 63.20 ± 15.97 and the anatomy basic competence score as 44.84 ± 6.69. A low positive correlation was found between the proficiency level in anatomy course and satisfaction with distance education (r = 0.301, p<0.001). The distance education system has taken its place in academic education permanently and is used extensively. The ability to rewatch lectures, the elimination of accommodation and transportation costs, and the clarity of instructional materials were identified as the most significant advantages of distance education. While inadequate application lessons, lack of internet infrastructure and lack of technological equipment in crowded families were criticized aspects of the system.
Downloads
References
Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(3):141-54. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00459-7.
Sun P, Lu X, Xu C, Sun W, Pan B. Understanding of COVID-19 based on current evidence. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):548-51. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25722.
Wang MY, Zhao R, Gao LJ, Gao XF, Wang DP, Cao JM. SARS-CoV-2: Structure, biology, and structure-based therapeutics development. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:587269. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.587269.
Raveendran AV, Jayadevan R. Reverse quarantine and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2020;14(5):1323-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.029.
Saiyad S, Virk A, Mahajan R, Singh T. Online teaching in medical training: Establishing good online teaching practices from cumulative experience. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020;10(3):149. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_358_20.
Chung JY, Thone MN, Kwon YJ. COVID-19 vaccines: The status and perspectives in delivery points of view. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;170:1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.12.011.
O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education: An integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.
Brassett C, Cosker T, Davies DC, Dockery P, Gillingwater TH, Lee TC, et al. COVID-19 and anatomy: Stimulus and initial response. J Anat. 2020;237(3):393-403. doi: 10.1111/joa.13274.
Heylings DJA. Anatomy 1999-2000: The curriculum, who teaches it and how? Med Educ. 2002;36(8):702-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01272.x.
Pather N, Blyth P, Chapman JA, Dayal MR, Flack NAMS, Fogg QA, et al. Forced disruption of anatomy education in Australia and New Zealand: An acute response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):284-300. doi: 10.1002/ase.1968.
Moszkowicz D, Duboc H, Dubertret C, Roux D, Bretagnol F. Daily medical education for confined students during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A simple videoconference solution. Clin Anat. 2020;33(6):927-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.23601.
Mustafa AG, Taha NR, Alshboul OA, Alsalem M, Malki MI. Using YouTube to learn anatomy: Perspectives of Jordanian medical students. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6861416. doi: 10.1155/2020/6861416.
Greene SJ. The use and effectiveness of interactive progressive drawing in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(5):445-60. doi: 10.1002/ase.1784.
Jiang N, Jiang Z, Huang Y, Sun M, Sun X, Huan Y, Li F. Application of augmented reality models of canine skull in veterinary anatomical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(3):546-57. doi: 10.1002/ase.2372.
Miltykh I, Kafarov ES, Covantsev S, Dadashev AS, Skarlis AA, Zenin OK. A new dimension in medical education: Virtual reality in anatomy during COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Anat. 2023;36(7):1007-15. doi: 10.1002/ca.24098.
Papa V, Varotto E, Galli M, Vaccarezza M, Galassi FM. One year of anatomy teaching and learning in the outbreak: Has the Covid-19 pandemic marked the end of a century-old practice? A systematic review. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(2):261-80. doi: 10.1002/ase.2162.
Xiao J, Evans DJR. Anatomy education beyond the Covid-19 pandemic: A changing pedagogy. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(6):1138-44. doi: 10.1002/ase.2222.
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017:10(6):549-59. doi: 10.1002/ase.1696.
Zhao J, Xu X, Jiang H, Ding Y. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Medical Education, 2020: 20(1). doi: doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1994-z.
Retrieved from: https://anatomie3d.univ-lyon1.fr/ressources-peda/muscle-deltoide/. (Accessed on Jan 12, 2025).
Metin AE, Karaman A, Şaştım YA. Student Perspectives on Distance Education and the Assessment of the Efficiency of Distance Education English Courses: Banaz Vocational College [in Turkish]. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017:7(2):640-52.
Wheble R, Channon S. What use is anatomy in first opinion small animal veterinary practice? A qualitative study. Anat Sci Educ. 2020:14(4):440-51. doi: 10.1002/ase.1995.
Van Nuland SE, Rogers KA. The anatomy of E-Learning tools: Does software usability influence learning outcomes? Anat Sci Educ. 2016:9(4):378-90. doi: 10.1002/ase.1589.
Nathaniel TI, Goodwin RL, Fowler L, McPhail B, Black AC. An adaptive blended learning model for the implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Anat Sci Educ. 2021:14(6):699-710. doi: 10.1002/ase.2097.
Viveka S, Pushpa N, Ravi K. Online learning modules in anatomical sciences: Effective sources for continued learning for medical undergraduates during the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. Galician Med J. 2021:28(3):E202136. doi: 10.21802/gmj.2021.3.6.
Bhat GM, Bhat IH, Shahdad S, Rashid S, Khan MA, Patloo AA. Analysis of feasibility and acceptability of an e-learning module in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2022:15(2):376-91. doi: 10.1002/ase.2096.
Mahdy MAA, Sayed RKA. Evaluation of the online learning of veterinary anatomy education during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown in Egypt: Students' perceptions. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(1):67-82. doi: 10.1002/ase.2149.
Martin JG, Mora CD, Henche SA. Possibilities for the use of Anatomage (the anatomical real body-size table) for teaching and learning anatomy with the students. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018:4(4):94. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.04.001094.
Said Ahmed MAA. Use of the anatomage virtual table in medical education and as a diagnostic tool: An Integrative Review. Cureus. 2023:15(3):e35981. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35981.
Shapiro L, Bell K, Dhas K, Branson T, Louw G, Keenan ID. Focused multisensory anatomy observation and drawing for enhancing social learning and three-dimensional spatial understanding. Anat Sci Educ. 2020:13(4):488-503. doi: 10.1002/ase.1929.
Shapiro L, Hobbs E, Keenan ID. Transforming musculoskeletal anatomy learning with haptic surface painting. Anat Sci Educ. 2023:16(4):677-93. doi: 10.1002/ase.2262.
Rabattu PY, Debarnot U, Hoyek N. Exploring the impact of interactive movement-based anatomy learning in real classroom setting among kinesiology students. Anat Sci Educ. 2023:16(1):148-56. doi: 10.1002/ase.2172.
Sangam MR, Deka R, G V, K P, Kaur A, Wahengbam M. Perception of first-year MBBS Students toward virtual dissection in learning anatomy: A comparative study between high and low academic achievers. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e72508. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72508.
Acar D. Comparison of anatomy teaching competence of students in different health care fields. Master's thesis. Kocaeli University, Health Science Institute; 2018.
Green RA, Whitburn LY, Zacharias A, Byrne G, Hughes DL. The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(5):471-7. doi: 10.1002/ase.1761.
Ferrer-Torregrosa J, Jiménez-Rodríguez MA, Torralba-Estelles J, Garzón-Farinós F, Pérez-Bermejo M, Fernández-Ehrling N. Distance learning ECTS and flipped classroom in the anatomy learning: Comparative study of the use of augmented reality, video, and notes. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0757-3.
Ahmed SA, Hegazy NN, Abdel Malak HW, Kayser WC, Elrafie NM, Hassanien M, et al. Model for utilizing distance learning post COVID-19 using (PACT)™: A cross-sectional qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02311-1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Holistence Publications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.
