Measurement of the basic anatomy knowledge and the satisfaction of students taking an anatomy course with video-animation support
Abstract
This experimental study was conducted to determine the self-efficacy perception and distance learning satisfaction of Kozaklı Vocational School students receiving animation-supported anatomy education. The study was conducted on 225 students who took active lessons in the distance education process using the student information form, Distance Education Assessment and Anatomy Self-Efficacy Questionnaires via Google form. It was determined that 51.7% of the participants lived in the city center, 31.8% in the district center, and 16.6% in the countryside. In this study, the total distance education satisfaction score was calculated as 63.20 ± 15.97 and the anatomy basic competence score as 44.84 ± 6.69. A low positive correlation was found between the proficiency level in anatomy course and satisfaction with distance education (r = 0.301, p<0.001). The distance education system has taken its place in academic education permanently and is used extensively. The ability to rewatch lectures, the elimination of accommodation and transportation costs, and the clarity of instructional materials were identified as the most significant advantages of distance education. While inadequate application lessons, lack of internet infrastructure and lack of technological equipment in crowded families were criticized aspects of the system.
Keywords:
Anatomy animation distance education questionnaireDownloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Holistence Publications

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.

