Corrective rape as a tool of sexual repression: A literature review and case analysis from the world and Turkey
Abstract
Corrective rape is a form of sexual violence aimed predominantly at lesbian, transgender, and gender nonconforming individuals with the supposed intention of “curing” them of their sexual orientation or gender identity (Phiri, 2011). Despite increasing visibility through advocacy efforts and media coverage, academic discourse on this phenomenon remains insufficient and disproportionately focused on certain geographies. This literature review explores corrective rape as a global instrument of sexual oppression rooted in heteronormativity and patriarchy. Drawing from scholarly research, NGO reports, and journalistic accounts, it highlights recurring patterns in motives, societal and institutional responses, and psychological consequences. Particular attention is given to South Africa, India, and Ecuador, where the phenomenon has been most documented, alongside emerging but underreported cases in Türkiye. The review concludes that corrective rape operates as a mechanism of genderbased control sustained by cultural, religious, and institutional forces. It calls for a multidisciplinary response involving legal reform, public education, and community-based support structures to combat this form of violence.
Keywords:
Corrective Rape Sexual Violence LGBTQ Turkey Gender-Based ViolenceDownloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Holistence Publications

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Everyone who is listed as an author in this article should have made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and should take public responsibility for it.




